My examples bolded the words in each Poynter post that matched the words of the source. While this had the effect of highlighting some confusing or incomplete attributions, my main point was quite different: that these aggregated posts didn’t offer any original thought or valuable synthesis of source materials; they’re merely condensed versions of the original. You can see that this was my main intent in the below example, where I bolded material Jim Romenesko rendered inside of quotes; while those portions raise aggregation issues, they clearly don’t raise attribution issues
CONFIRMED: it’s all about Moos. CJR is blameless.
Source: cjr.org
21 Notes/ Hide
-
live-sport liked this
-
zaidakennamer reblogged this from felixsalmon
-
ultimategamingsite liked this
-
yourbestgamingblog liked this
-
sandiegomobilerik liked this
-
sushiinthecan liked this
-
strictlyalright liked this
-
shortformblog reblogged this from fek and added:
Oh jeez, what are you doing Romenesko?
-
brianvan liked this
-
davidquigg liked this
-
notable liked this
-
shortformblog liked this
-
richardrushfield liked this
-
fek liked this
-
fek reblogged this from felixsalmon
-
andrewgraham liked this
-
firthofforth reblogged this from felixsalmon
-
felixsalmon posted this